As defined in the University Code of Student Rights and Responsibilities, Academic Misconduct includes, but is not limited to, cheating, misrepresenting one's work, inappropriately collaborating, plagiarism, and fabrication or falsification of information. It also includes facilitating Academic Misconduct by intentionally helping or attempting to help another student to commit an act of Academic Misconduct. A primary example of Academic Misconduct is submitting as one's own, work that is copied from an outside source.
Important Notes
The Kahlert School of Computing is dedicated to the highest levels of honor and achievement. Our graduates go on to positions where their decisions and abilities will affect all of society. Integrity, skill, knowledge, and professionalism are hallmarks of our graduates. This is a reputation that the School vigorously maintains and defends.
Students who cheat (or otherwise break these expectations) not only hurt themselves and their ability to pass the subsequent courses, but also harm their current and future peers by lowering the perceived quality of the degree.
It is up to the student to make sure they understand the policies of each individual course when it comes to what is and is not misconduct. Such information should be found in the course syllabus, but students are encouraged to speak directly with the instructor if any question remains. When in doubt, err on the side of asking permission!
The Kahlert School of Computing uses rigorous plagiarism detection systems. These systems are designed knowing that solutions to standard problems will be similar, and are very accurate when distinguishing between "happenstance" and "collusion". Students who create their solutions through standard methods (i.e., hard work, practice, and learning) will almost never be accused of plagiarism.
For those students who wish an extra level of evidence to support themselves, the following suggestions should be followed:
Students believing an academic action taken to be arbitrary or capricious should first contact the instructor and attempt to resolve the issue. If the issue is not resolved expediently and directly by the instructor, or extenuating circumstances preclude contacting the instructor, students should contact the Director of Undergraduate Studies for advice and instructions on further appeals.
Appeals are grouped into two categories:
Appeal of a failing (or other) grade sanction:
Students who are failed in a course (or had a grade lowered) based on academic misconduct can appeal this action through the College of Engineering Academic Appeals Committee. As previously stated, the Director of Undergraduate Studies can offer advice and/or counseling for the student.
An email should be sent to the Associate Dean of Academic Affairs for the College of Engineering containing pertinent information (see below).
Appeal other actions by a faculty member:
Students who believe a course instructor has arbitrarily or capriciously taken an action that has adversely affected the student can ask the Director of the Kahlert School of Computing (director@cs.utah.edu) to intercede. The email should contain all pertinent information (see below).
In either case, the student should prepare a written statement summarizing the situation. The letter should include:
Please send the email from your University email account.